FR EN ES PT
Browse forums
Score : 8366

Gonna do something about this or nah ankama?

By Xillor-The-Shadow - MEMBER - February 11, 2018, 23:45:28
AnkaTracker
literally impossible for the 1 nation to win
0
First Ankama intervention
Hey guys,

We appreciate your feedback, they have been shared with the team for discussion. Have you tried discussing with your Governor in recruiting PvP players or making alliances with other nations? Politics is also a strategy in war.
See message in context
Reactions 21
Score : 11286
If there's enough server population for 1 nation vs 4 nations to still be a 40vs40 fight then it would be balanced. Unfortunately that is distinctly not the case on any of the english/international servers. But even so the mode itself is pretty flawed. A 6v1 militia chief fight is an easy 500 points. A 6v6 militia chief fight is 0 points, because you will never finish that in time.

Also unfortinately Flower Capture mode is basically only playable at like 10v10, so if you had enough players to fill Escort mode then that means flower capture is going be completely broken.
2
Score : 8366
We had a decent lead in this one but then everybody from the other battlefield showed up and we instantly lost.
-2
Hey guys,

We appreciate your feedback, they have been shared with the team for discussion. Have you tried discussing with your Governor in recruiting PvP players or making alliances with other nations? Politics is also a strategy in war.
Score : 974
I hate to admit but this is quite right lol
2
Score : -229
Battlefields are working as intended.
 


Maybe make an Alliance with Amakna, but Barinade, I'm going to tell you this as kindly as I can:

"Ankama isn't going to change the game specifically so that you can win, so stop screeching about it."

Also, stop crying that you don't have a 100% win rate. You're embarassing yourself. 
-6
Score : 1136
With Nox's declining population what can you expect? but when the numbers get higher like Remi then you really see where the issue lies with ''Alliances''. I suppose most of the outcry about the platonic implementation of Battlefields also supports what i'm saying here. So instead of calling out someone who see's the bigger picture, you may want to look at it from all perspectives. ''You're embarrassing yourself'' doesn't really make your point valid over his, sir.
2
Score : 5396
Is there a point anywhere in your post??
-5
Score : 8366
seems fair ankama. Nobody wants to be on any side but the winning side. This is a flawed system.
2
Score : 974
This is a wild idea but maybe a Randomized Nation Generator  would be a good thing to have. Probably.
1
Score : 472
 
Jenarall|2018-02-12 15:35:39
With Nox's declining population what can you expect? but when the numbers get higher like Remi then you really see where the issue lies with ''Alliances''. I suppose most of the outcry about the platonic implementation of Battlefields also supports what i'm saying here. So instead of calling out someone who see's the bigger picture, you may want to look at it from all perspectives. ''You're embarrassing yourself'' doesn't really make your point valid over his, sir.


i will say more in players than alliances, remi now have just 1 guild that focus on BG.
if you go on BG you jump in fight 3-6 ppl vs 20-30ppl coz this
0
Score : 3075
People on the winning side just keeps trying to beat the same lie in to their and others heads about how losing side just need to git gud and get an alliance ...and it all be fine and dandy 
But like Seriously. Are you people blind?

In order
Remington, Nox, Phaeris 
How is this fair and functional?
Only server without 2 formed alliances is Nox 
and there is still same issues on all servers. 
This system Does Not work with 5 nations. 
If we look at Remi it don't work even for the 2nd alliance either.
I would love to put Phaeris in that example too ..since it's still 2nd alliance that have lesser territories but their population is so low so it's just too bad to even have as "proof" for how bad this system is.
1
Score : 24534
Perhaps riktus should have no alliances? Afterall they are meant to be bandits, outlaws.

OR perhaps alliances shouldn't be taken into account in battlefield and make all for all fights. And make it so people with less players in team get bonus points per actions, something to give them hope they can win despite being outnumbered.
1
Score : 796
In the end the other 3 nations will end up with 1 territory each, right?
1
Score : -122
How about stop making crybaby threads every 4 hours, chill. You have big talk but complain when you get countered lol
-2
Score : 29
I've tried to suggest to y'all to form an alliance with the other two nations, but, no.  No one wants to make an alliance, so it will continue to be Sufonta/Bontokia allied, and anyone else on their own when defending.  Governor won't make an alliance?  Vote for someone else.  Member of Brakmar said the Amaknan gov. isn't a willing participant in any alliance.  So talk to more Amaknans, and get them to change their governor.  The solution isn't always "wah wah my team loses all the time so nerf everything."
-4
Score : 796
This doesn't work because most people cannot vote. Wakfu is an oligarchy, this means the only power the majority has is to choose their nations so everybody will just join whoever is winning.
2
Score : 942
Honestly i think ankama should just give an advantage to the nation defending. Not sure what though
-1
Respond to this thread