Forum

After seeing the entire Lard set i changed my mind gonna be op on Fire Tank Summon osa

Haven't read any replies to this devblog, so this might have already been said.

1. The gap between rich and poor players will not improve by letting bosses drop kamas. It is the rich players who kill bosses often, they get the rare boss drops, and they sell the rare boss drops, and that is why they are rich in the first place.

2. By introducing more kamas into the economy, inflation will occur. The fact that every single player can create brand new kamas without removing anything from the economy means that the game will always suffer inflation, but adding even more kamas by letting the bosses drop them will only make the matters worse.

3. The issue with items being considered unsellable because they are too common would not be solved by inflating the economy. It would, however, easily be solved if you were to revert the markets back to what they were a year ago (or maybe make a combination of the two systems). Back when a player could place their haven bag anywhere on the trade bridge and then register their entire haven bag content with one click, the market was thriving in a way that is impossible now. Players who are actively looking for the common drops actually have issues finding them now, because other players believe they are unsellable, but they are very much sellable if only they were easier to find. I remember trade bridges being completely filled with haven bags, so filled that you would not find ONE empty space on the entire bridge, and I am confident that the playerbase is still big enough for that to happen if only the market system were to encourage it like it used to.

4. The market would also be better off if taxes were to be applied upon sales instead of upon advertising. In the real world you pay taxes when items are actually being exchanged between people, not every single time one person is simply trying to sell it. Taxes in the game right now are discouraging selling items and therefor hurting the market. Yes, it is true that the governments will get less kamas if the taxes were to be applied less often, but the market would also be used a lot more which should result in more kamas in the treasury.

5. I like that 1 kama means a lot. It is different from other games. If it is too hard for a new player to get 1 kama, don't inflate the entire economy but just simply give them 10 kamas together with Jonk's bag and they will have a decent starter pack right there. An extra introduction of 10 kamas per character will not inflate the economy much, but all your other ideas would.

I hope it is clear that I am against all the ideas posted in this devblog, and I hope my suggestions will give you a different perspective and better ideas.

People like you will never understand situations like not be able to connect to internet or whatsoever the first person who made this topic, summoned up..
For your care (or not) some people have A REAL LIFE!! They can't be online everyday even not for 5 minutes.

Besides making a fair MMO is Possible!! I quit wakfu for a lot of reasons and this stupid Almanax is one them. I'm playing Tera Online, and in that game you can get a mount already when you are lvl 11. I played this game for more than 2 years now, I'm playing it from early beta. I have seen a lot of crap from Ankama, and to be honest they don't respect their customers. You pay for this game, everybody has right for a mount, not only people who will play another year. The person who made this topic paid for this game too, he paid for his time in this game but what does he get?? Not even a mount!! Thats not fair,,, like I said, there are other games where you can get mounts on lvl 11 already or higher lvl. That you accept this doesn't make it "normal" or "acceptable"...

Anyway, happy wakfu'ing, I'm not wasting anytime for this game anymore, not worth it..

Cheers.

You got it wrong^^ it doesnt mean spell 1 spell 2 ect. from the element tree.

it goes by the level of those spells. Your highest spell in the element tree gives 0,1, 2nd highest 0,6 and so on

"I would like to share with you the calculation of the elemental mastery: you first start by sorting out your spells per level and then follow this calculation: (“Spell 1” x 0.1 + “Spell 2” x 0.6 + “Spell 3 * 0.7 + “Spell 4” x 0.3 + “Spell 5” x 0.3) if I'm not mistaken, of course. Those coefficients are 0.1, 0.6, 0.7, 0.3, and 0.3 per spell level by sorting them from highest to lowest."

I love how a major nerf to the panda (cannot carry monster anymore) is presented as a way to save AP. It's not a nerf, it's a feature!

Also why subtract tactical possibilities instead of adding them or leaving them be? Is there anyone in this game convinced that panda needed a nerf? Or the fire rogue for that matter?

Ecosystem Stasis has nothing to do with it.

The damage is set and can only be increased via

-Backstab modifier (and backstab gears)
-Crit
-Stasisfied Debuff

You are not supposed to be building pure stasis with Foggernaut. The stasis branch gains twice as much exp compared to other branch. You are suppose to level it ALONG with the other branches.

Nyeheh~

Thanks Troyle for the information.

About the UBs' resistance against Statis, isn't 70% final resist too much? They are immune to the Stasified state so Statis's damage can't be increased. A 10 AP Statis Foggernaut using x2 Heart of Steam would only do about 104 damage per turn.

Isn't it then a disadvantage to have a Statis Foggernaut in an UB battle?

Am I the only one concerned that there is potential child pron?..