Incorrect login detailsYour account is permanently bannedYour account has been placed under a protective block for security reasons. Please contact support.Your account has been deletedYou have reached the limit of authorised attemptsYour account name has been blacklistedThis Ankama account is protected by the Authenticator.
Open the Authenticator application.
Select your account.
You will have 30 seconds to retype your account information.
What is the better spell? When compared side by side at level 200, Jabs only has a 10 base damage advantage than Flurry but Flurry gives you a more stable opportunity to gain Power. After testing in the Training Room there is only a couple of points away from two flurries and one jab. Even with Flurry you have a better chance to critical with each hit potentially dealing more damage than a jab.
A better alternative would be to use flurry to gain power then use jabs to maintain it.
Another thing to consider is usually most air iops destroy whats in front of them without power anyway.
Example 10 ap iop level 100 with level 100 spells 20% crit (80% non crit).
Jabs 2 ap 32 non-crit, 48 crit.
Non crit 32*5 attacks*0.8 = 128
Crit = 48*5*.2=48
128+48= 176 average damage
Flurry 1 ap 14 non-crit, 21 crit.
Non crit 14*10*0.8=112
Crit = 21*10*.2=42
112+42=154 average damage
So adding the fact flurry will increase power fast it is likely it will deal more damage when trying to gain power. The second 100% power has been reached jabs should do more damage.
The more damage and crit you add jabs will still win because of the higher base damage on the combo.
I prefer Jabs. Higher base DPT overall. Running a 12 AP set-up, so usually Power maintenance is not an issue and I can just roll out with maximum DPT.
Flurry is a really good alternative though. But I think it'd get a bit monotonous for me, as if Jabs wasn't annoying enough to spam sometimes. Plus there are several instances were lesser hits on enemies is a preferable thing.